Blog posted 19 May 2017 (revised)
The following is in reply to an email I received on 17 May 2017 from the IPCC. A copy of that email is provided at the end, and links to related information.
The IPCC. Rotten To The Core.
I refer to your willfuly misleading email of 17 May 2017.
As you are well aware the IPCC cannot investigate my official complaint, case reference number : 2016/065047, because my false arrest in December 2015 for “Harassment with Violence” was in connection with my false arrest in April 2012.
You will recall this original conspiracy to pervert the course of justice resulted in 4 Officers with Devon & Cornwall Police being reprimanded only by the IPCC following a white wash by the (PSD) and a cover up by the IPCC.
You will also recall the IPCC willfuly neglected to investigate more serious allegations and evidence before making it’s decision and closing the Complaint/Appeal.
I acknowledge a number of Conflicts of Interest also exists.
I have since added Detective Inspector Claire Stalley and then Superintendent Jim ‘Hot Fuzz’ Colwell to the list of conspirators in response to the IPCC’s failure to determine if the 4 Officers were ordered to do what they did or if they were bribed.
The “Circumstances” surrounding my arrest in December 2015, according to the Custody Record Front Sheet, below, was “DP has previously been issues an harassment notice but has continued his harassment of another including threats of violence”, unquote.
Despite the issue of “with Violence” not being discussed in recorded interview the term was dropped because the allegation was both groundless and defamatory.
The “Comment made when facts of arrest explained”, falsely declares “No” because I immediately challenged the “Harassment with Violence” allegation and which the other PS who was present recorded in his notebook.
With regard to reference number : CO/679/16 the IPCC cannot investigate any “appeal” resulting from an attempt to pervert the course of justice by Chief Constable Shaun Sawyer, Mr P Chudley (PSD), Mrs Angliss (PSD), Trainee Inspector 15434 Reid, PS 5434 Paul Jones and Temporary Chief Inspector Rachel Bentley, who should have all been suspended by now following my complaint.
If the IPCC seeks to investigate any “appeal” I do not recognize, accept or have requested, as is the case, then the IPCC is further party to the same conspiracy to pervert the course of justice to cover up an even greater conspiracy involving some 20 additional police officers and personnel, and others, and including the former and present OPCC.
The greater conspiracy being the false criminal allegations lodged against me by the Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust for Cornwall Council in November 2015, and funded by the public, to stop me engaging in free speech on the internet and exposing crimes committed by the Council and the Trust.
Crimes that were never investigated by Devon & Cornwall Police to establish the truth or my innocence.
A greater conspiracy that involved my legal defence being chosen by the police to better protect the Council and the Trust. Coodes Solicitors CILEx Stephanie Allen who set me up for a false confession and a guilty only plea Court and later removed most of the incriminating evidence in my defence against Cornwall Council and the Trust, and who has since disappeared.
Recorded Interview evidence which was edited by the police to exclude incriminating evidence against the Council and Trust and certain comments made by the multi tasking PS 16259 Innes Dowlen.
The force Data Protection Unit breaking the law and withholding evidence for some 6 months and which has still not yet provided me with all the information I am entitled to receive under the Act.
Court appearances which were knowingly a waste of public funds and a corrupt CPS that must have known what was going on.
The abuse of Legal Aid funds by Coodes Solicitor Mike Gregson, the appointed litigator, because the funds were not used to protect his client. A Solicitor who I never even met.
I would like to think the magistrates at Bodmin were not party to what was going on in their Court rooms but nothing would surprise me now.
So what is it all about? A brief summary :
In 2012 my mentally ill wife, and many others, was the victim of rigged Cornwall Homechoice Welfare Priority Assessments. Despite Cornwall Council and the Trust knowing my wife had a 30 year history of mental health disorders and acknowledged her health was deteriorating at that time of the Assessments the flawed Welfare Panel awarded her Low Welfare Priority only.
Following the Assessments there was no follow up or offer of help from the Trust or the Council despite them knowing she came under their umbrella, she lived alone, and that the Assessments were legally and willfuly flawed.
Within 8 months her health deteriorated further and she was murdered at the Royal Cornwall Hospital on 27 June 2013 by induced sepsis aged just 54.
Even Moors murderer Ian Brady was given palliative care before he died.
On a more positive note I hope the IPCC will contact the relevant government minister and departments, as I will, to support my request for a government inquiry or similar.
I appreciate turkeys would not normally vote for Christmas.
34 Timber Close, St Austell, Cornwall. PL25 5NZ
Our reference number: 2016/065047
Your reference number: CO/679/16
Mr. Geoffrey McLaughlin
Email sent to email@example.com
17 May 2017
Dear Mr. McLaughlin,
Thank you for your appeal of 11 May 2017, received in this office on the same date. You asked us to review the investigation of your complaint by Devon & Cornwall Constabulary.
This email confirms that we have received your appeal. We have not yet looked at the issues you have raised. Our role is to independently review the decisions and actions of the police, not to reinvestigate your complaint. This will involve looking at all the points that you have raised in relation to the investigation of your original complaint.
We will contact Devon & Cornwall Constabulary to get all the information they hold about your complaint. This will be used to assess your appeal along with the information you have submitted as your appeal. You will not be able to provide additional information for us to consider after a decision is made on your appeal. Any decision we make is final.
We deal with appeals in date order based on the date they are received by the IPCC and we will look at your appeal as soon as we can. From the date we received your appeal it may take up to 10 weeks for it to be allocated. However, it is possible that your appeal may be allocated more quickly than this.
Please see the appeals area of the IPCC website for the latest information, and the date of appeals that are currently being reviewed. We have also enclosed a document with additional information. Please contact us if you have any other questions.
Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)
Tel: 0161 246 8502
Open Letter To The IPCC. Still as Bent as a Nine Bob Note. https://justiceforalison.wordpress.com/2017/05/10/open-letter-to-the-ipcc-still-as-bent-as-a-nine-bob-note/?iframe=true&theme_preview=true via
Open Letter To Chief Constable Shaun Sawyer. And Don’t Slam The Door On Your Way Out. https://justiceforalison.wordpress.com/2017/05/02/open-letter-to-chief-constable-shaun-sawyer-and-dont-slam-the-door-on-your-way-out/?
Open Letter To Chief Constable Shaun Sawyer. Part 2. https://justiceforalison.wordpress.com/2017/05/07/open-letter-to-chief-constable-shaun-sawyer-part-2-i-did-ask-you-politely-not-to-slam-the-door/?